- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:25:16 +1000
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Perhaps it would be best to agree first on what the success criteria are for the three conformance levels; then return to the checkpoint text itself to make sure that it is consistent with the success criteria. This strategy has worked in relation to some of the other checkpoints. I think the real controversies surrounding 4.1 relate to what the success criteria ought to be at each of the conformance levels. I also expect that there will be much advisory material included under 4.1, providing additional, non-testable but nonetheless useful, guidance to implementors.
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 23:26:26 UTC