W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Metadata (was RE: Agenda)

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 17:18:42 +1000
Message-ID: <15595.18002.452625.204588@jdc.local>
To: GV@trace.wisc.edu
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Would the suggestion then be that implementors ought to be permitted
to make assertions in metadata regarding the checkpoints which they
have satisfied, even if they haven't met the minimal requirements of
conformance?

Presumably a tool which reads the metadata could distinguish between
accessibility-related assertions not amounting to a conformance claim,
but which might still be helpful to the user, and an actual assertion
of conformance to the guidelines.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 03:18:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT