W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: New SHORT TITLES. POSTED TO LIST FOR COMMENT ---ROBUST

From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:33:05 +1000
Message-Id: <H00000e00047db2d.1021253585.tux.sofcom.com.au@MHS>
TO: GV@trace.wisc.edu, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
How about 'Technically robust"

Gian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GV [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, 28 April 2002 2:02 PM
> To: w3c-wai-gl
> Subject: RE: New SHORT TITLES. POSTED TO LIST FOR COMMENT ---ROBUST
> 
> 
> Since "Technology Robust" just leaves people scratching their heads --
> how about we just go with ROBUST for now -- and use the full title to
> describe what type of ROBUST we mean.  (maybe we will find other types
> of Robustness we want to put in there anyway.
> 
> That also gives us a complete set of one word items
> 
>  Anyone with any other ideas, keep posting them.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> Gregg
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace,  Univ of Wis
> gv@trace.wisc.edu
> 
>  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   Perceivable
> > 
> >   Operable
> > 
> >   Navigable
> > 
> >   Understandable
> > 
> >   Robust
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2002 21:33:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT