W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: VOTE

From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:51:32 -0700
Message-ID: <7164D4266FD7B94CA59D551C7FE6618D03970F6A@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like 4 too.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt May [mailto:mcmay@bestkungfu.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:04 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: VOTE


I vote for #4.

-
m
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@Adobe.com>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: VOTE


> After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4:
>  
>  
> WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is 
> designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and 
> easier to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The 
> Checkpoint Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows 
> the way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG 
> 2.0.
>  
> 
> Loretta
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 13:52:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT