W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002


From: Slaydon, Eugenia <ESlaydon@beacontec.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:25:04 -0400
Message-ID: <D47827B1DE559D458AB76C6E6EADFC669CD46A@tortugas.beacontec.com>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I like Loretta's Alternate 4.

Eugenia Slaydon
Beacon Technologies, Inc.
336-931-1295 ext. 225

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:GV@trace.wisc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:00 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: VOTE

Loretta's rewrite seems to capture nicely the objectives of the previous

Please comment on this wording.  
Also, if you like the others better - please comment.   


Loretta wrote

 After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4:
WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is
designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and easier
to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The
Checkpoint Mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows the
way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG 2

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 09:16:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:41 UTC