W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: VOTE

From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@mi.madritel.es>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:20:19 +0200
Message-ID: <003001c1f5b9$2bd97130$1b4225d5@emmanuelle1>
To: <GV@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I like version 4.
regards,
Emmanuelle

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <GV@trace.wisc.edu>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: RE: VOTE


> Loretta's rewrite seems to capture nicely the objectives of the previous
> versions.
> 
> Please comment on this wording.  
> Also, if you like the others better - please comment.   
> 
> Gregg
> 
>  
> Loretta wrote
> 
>  After considering the 3 alternatives, I'm proposing ALTERNATE 4:
>  
> WCAG 2.0 is based on the same principles as WCAG 1.0. However, it is
> designed to be less technology-specific so that it is clearer and easier
> to apply those principles to a wide range of technologies. The
> Checkpoint Mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft shows the
> way that the principles of WCAG 1.0 have been generalized in WCAG 2
> 
> Loretta
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 07:24:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT