Re: open issues - another

I would suggest that we only include the terms which are used in the
guidelines. We can link to the full glossary or anyone looking for a
general-purpose glossary.

chaals

On Thu, 2 May 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

  Note to reviewers: Should we include the entire glossary or just the
  definitions of terms appearing in the guidelines? We also need to make
  sure that the  <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/Glossary/> glossary definitions
  are the same as the definitions which appear in the guidelines
  themselves. For now, a simple list of the terms that are defined in this
  document are included below. Definitions for each term will be included
  at a later date.

  -Ben







  -- ------------------------------
  Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
  Professor - Human Factors
  Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
  Director - Trace R & D Center
  University of Wisconsin-Madison
  Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
  FAX 608/262-8848
  For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
  <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>





-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)