- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi, I too prefer perceptible, although I think it is a question of language style rather than different meanings. I am happy about dropping the "(including Orientation)" - that should be an obvious part of navigable. I don't think technology robust means anything. I had to look up where it was being used to get any clue at all. Robust on its own is slightly more obvious, but I hope another word could be found at some point. cheers Chaals On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: At our meeting today it was suggested (and we all agreed) to make all the SHORT TITLES conform to the same part of speech. The list we came up with was. [snip] I would like to now suggest that we just drop the parenthetical and have Perceivable Operable Navigable Understandable Technology Robust
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 03:25:24 UTC