W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: CSS versus tables

From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 20:34:18 -0800
Message-Id: <200201010434.g014YI35022135@newbolt.sonic.net>
To: andrew.mcfarland@unite.net, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

I'm a little unclear.  When you use CSS for web pages, are you using a
tool written in perl or are you hand coding the CSS?  If you are using perl,
I was wondering what your experience is with hand coding CSS?


PS  What does your perl tool do?

> At 11:46 28/12/2001 -0500, Slaydon, Eugenia wrote:
> >Just from a developer who does this daily - I can layout a page with tables
> >in about a 1/4 of the time to do it with css
> I'm also a developer, and I do this sort of thing almost daily as well. I 
> find the opposite is true. CSS takes me less time than tables. I think it 
> is a mixture of personal style, and the nature of the website you are 
> doing. At UNITE, our perl seems to lend itself very easily to css layouts.
> It must be said, there is at least one table based layout I couldn't get to 
> work in Netscape 4.7 using CSS.
> Andrew
Received on Monday, 31 December 2001 23:34:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:39 UTC