At 11:17 AM -0800 12/21/01, Scott Luebking wrote: >If the first is called the 'universal' format (I'm still looking for >another name), it would be just a matter of having the 'universal' tree, e.g. www.zzz.com/universal I agree it needs a different name -- if just for the reason that it's absurd to suggest that a page which meets the needs for a blind user is necessarily going to be the best format for meeting the needs of a user with cognitive disabilities. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201Received on Monday, 24 December 2001 21:33:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:17 GMT