W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: "objective" clarified

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:11:30 -0800
Message-Id: <a05101000b835f1c20bdb@[10.0.1.33]>
To: "Cynthia Shelly" <cyns@microsoft.com>, <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 2:47 PM -0800 12/6/01, Cynthia Shelly wrote:
>I don't think it actually matters that a guideline is objective, as long
>as it is testable.  I think Gregg's original definition is a long way
>towards a definition of "testable".

I agree.  I am fine with "testable", and I don't think "objective" is
as important of a concept.  My objections vanish entirely if the previous
discussion is revised to say "here is our definition for 'testable'."

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 00:03:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT