W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Checkpoint 2.4 beta 2

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@contenu.nu>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:50:36 -0500
Message-Id: <a0510030bb828847505fe@[65.92.106.152]>
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@W3.org>
>Can you think of a another work for expiry.
>Synonyms I found were "expiration" and "termination"

How is "expiry" bad?

>Most of the time, the problem is events that expire without user action.
>Rather they expire because of a time limit.    In some cases the time
>limit is a period of time in which the user has to act or a default
>selection is made for them.   In other cases, it is a time which they
>are given to comprehend something before it is removed.



Checkpoint 2.4 beta 2

For events whose deadline is set by the page author and depend on 
user actions, do either of the following:

* Give users control over how long they can interact with the content.
* Give them as much time as possible.

For events that occur in real time independent of user actions, warn 
the user when the event is set to expire.



[Note that this is not quite symmetrical. The author may decide on 
the real-time deadline but they may have nothing to do with user 
actions (e.g., "My birthday is next Monday. Mail me before then"; "I 
usually update my links page at 5:00; if you want me to include your 
site, get in touch with me before then").]



Success criteria

You will have met the requirements for cases involving user actions
if any of the following is true:

* The user can completely deactivate automatic timeouts or updating.

* The user can set the timeout to a figure up to 10 times the default 
timeout period.

* The user is warned before time expires and given at least 10 
seconds to extend the time available.

* The user is allowed to set how often the content is updated.

* The user is given as much time as possible.

In all cases, the user must be able to freeze moving text.


-- 
         Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
         Weblogs, resources, & articles by the hundreds:
         <http://joeclark.org> | <http://fawny.org>
         <http://www.contenu.nu/nublog.html>
Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 19:35:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT