- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 23:08:15 -0700
- To: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 7:03 PM -0400 2001/10/23, Anne Pemberton wrote: >Matt and Kynn, > > Studying the conformance scheme ideas .... I think when Kynn >says he wants it to be flexible, he means with little or no >conformance scheme - put out the guidelines and let everyone pick >and choose what to follow? Such a scheme would lend itself to a >variety of interpretations by policy-makers as well as by those who >direct the web designers' work. The alternative is a priority scheme >(which is the task this week) .... Issue, as a W3C note, a set of non-normative "example accessibility policies" after soliciting input from various site operator groups. Just don't make it a part of the official spec, which should be a toolkit. --Kynn (If you guys played Third Edition Dungeons and Dragons this would be so much easier to explain via analogy.) -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Friday, 26 October 2001 02:58:27 UTC