- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:12:01 -0400
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Very impressed with today's call! Time well spent!
Anne
At 05:49 PM 10/18/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Summary of consensus and action items
>
>- Consensus item:There would be a minimum standard of accessibility. In
>order for site to assert any level of conformance, the content must meet
>this minimum standard that consists of predetermined set of checkpoints.
>/* GV has exact wording */
>- Action WC: take discussion to ERT WG. How make statement for whole site
>vs. particular page vs. specific element - how do search engines discover.
>WCAG wants a scenario to show that it is possible.
>- Consensus item: Seems like a good idea to express conformance claims in
>a machine-readable form, but we aren't sure if we should require it of all
>claims or suggest it be used.
>- Action everyone: For next week - What causes something to be in or out
>of the minimum set?
>
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/10/18-minutes.html
>
>
>
>--
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>seattle, wa usa
>/--
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 20:55:57 UTC