Very impressed with today's call! Time well spent! Anne At 05:49 PM 10/18/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >Summary of consensus and action items > >- Consensus item:There would be a minimum standard of accessibility. In >order for site to assert any level of conformance, the content must meet >this minimum standard that consists of predetermined set of checkpoints. >/* GV has exact wording */ >- Action WC: take discussion to ERT WG. How make statement for whole site >vs. particular page vs. specific element - how do search engines discover. >WCAG wants a scenario to show that it is possible. >- Consensus item: Seems like a good idea to express conformance claims in >a machine-readable form, but we aren't sure if we should require it of all >claims or suggest it be used. >- Action everyone: For next week - What causes something to be in or out >of the minimum set? > >http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/10/18-minutes.html > > > >-- >wendy a chisholm >world wide web consortium >web accessibility initiative >seattle, wa usa >/-- Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 20:55:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT