W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: 18 October 2001 WCAG WG minutes

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:12:01 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Very impressed with today's call! Time well spent!


At 05:49 PM 10/18/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Summary of consensus and action items
>- Consensus item:There would be a minimum standard of accessibility. In 
>order for site to assert any level of conformance, the content must meet 
>this minimum standard that consists of predetermined set of checkpoints. 
>/* GV has exact wording */
>- Action WC: take discussion to ERT WG. How make statement for whole site 
>vs. particular page vs. specific element - how do search engines discover. 
>WCAG wants a scenario to show that it is possible.
>- Consensus item: Seems like a good idea to express conformance claims in 
>a machine-readable form, but we aren't sure if we should require it of all 
>claims or suggest it be used.
>- Action everyone: For next week - What causes something to be in or out 
>of the minimum set?
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>seattle, wa usa

Anne Pemberton

Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 20:55:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:39 UTC