W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: 18 October 2001 WCAG WG minutes

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:12:01 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011018190952.00a27ba0@pop.erols.com>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Very impressed with today's call! Time well spent!

                                 Anne

At 05:49 PM 10/18/01 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Summary of consensus and action items
>
>- Consensus item:There would be a minimum standard of accessibility. In 
>order for site to assert any level of conformance, the content must meet 
>this minimum standard that consists of predetermined set of checkpoints. 
>/* GV has exact wording */
>- Action WC: take discussion to ERT WG. How make statement for whole site 
>vs. particular page vs. specific element - how do search engines discover. 
>WCAG wants a scenario to show that it is possible.
>- Consensus item: Seems like a good idea to express conformance claims in 
>a machine-readable form, but we aren't sure if we should require it of all 
>claims or suggest it be used.
>- Action everyone: For next week - What causes something to be in or out 
>of the minimum set?
>
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2001/10/18-minutes.html
>
>
>
>--
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>seattle, wa usa
>/--

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 20:55:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT