W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 06:59:52 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011009064427.00a200e0@pop.erols.com>
To: "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg,

         I'm still unclear who the audience is for the conformance claims. 
If the user has to go to the page (which may be inaccessible to him/her), 
and has to find a logo and click on it to find out which checkpoints were 
skipped so he/she can't use the page, is this of any help to the user?

         Which search engines are capable of reading metadata and conveying 
the information to the user?

         Consider a user who needs illustration to understand text? How 
will the conformance claims help such a user locate a bank, for instance, 
that uses illustrations in to guide user through the desired banking steps?

                                                 Anne

At 12:11 AM 10/9/01 -0500, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>Hi Anne
>
>I agree that there should be a straightforward way to see what the A+
>means.  This was provided for in 1.4 I believe.
>The person would click on the conformance claim and it would tell you
>what the Plus meant.   That is, it would tell you what the person did
>beyond A.
>
>And this was just a suggestion to go on the list of suggestions or
>ideas.
>
>Gregg
>
>
>"1.4. Individuals doing more than A would claim A+.  Clicking on the +
>would take them to a list of the items covered by the +. "
>
>[This should more clearly have said, clicking on the A+ logo would take
>you to a list of items covered beyond A. ]
>
>-- ------------------------------
>Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>Professor - Human Factors
>Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
>Director - Trace R & D Center
>Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
>FAX 608/262-8848
>For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
><mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anne Pemberton [mailto:apembert@erols.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:59 PM
>To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)
>Subject: Re: Conformance Ideas -- Collection #1
>Importance: High
>
>Gregg,
>
>          I'm a bit confused as to how conformance is reported or
>asserted?
>
>          If it is inserted as metadata, how is the information provided
>to
>the user? By reading the source view of a page? If the information isn't
>
>provided to the user, for whom is it intended?
>
>          I don't think that A+7 tells anyone anything about what is and
>isn't complied with. I would much prefer two divisions, A, for the
>minimum
>requirements, and double A for meeting all requirements. It will be
>easier
>to monitor, and easier for the page author to understand.
>
>                                          Anne
>
>
>At 11:47 PM 10/7/01 -0500, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> >----------------------------------------------
> >
> >#1 CONFORMANCE IDEA
> >
> >1.1.  We have layers of conformance (A, Double A, Triple A).
>
>
>Anne Pemberton
>apembert@erols.com
>
>http://www.erols.com/stevepem
>http://www.geocities.com/apembert45

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 07:03:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT