W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Subject=FW:%20CONSENSUS%20REVISED.%20%20%209-28-01&In-Reply-To= <001d01c14b01$607c64a0$066fa8c0@750>

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:01:32 +1000
Message-ID: <15290.43452.535507.584780@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Perhaps one solution would be to replace C5 and C6 by the following
statements:

C5 The guidelines shall make clear, in the rationale accompanying each
checkpoint, which needs will be met if the checkpoint is satisfied,
and shall identify relevant disabilities and circumstances which
can give rise to such needs.

C6 seems redundant as we already have a consensus statement to the
effect that conformance claims cannot be made on the basis of
disability.
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2001 02:01:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT