W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Action Item: 3.3 Proposal (Writing Style)

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:58:00 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010312185658.00c53cd0@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
Cc: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 05:01 PM 3/12/2001 , Matt May wrote:
>Since the decision to claim compliance rests with a
>site's designers, I think it's imperative that the bar they're reaching
>for is well-defined, or they won't try at all. (I see similar issues
>with 3.4 ["Use Multimedia to illustrate concepts"] and 3.7 ["Divide
>information into smaller, more manageable units"].)

You are correct that 3.4 and 3.7 are problematic.  Hopefully if
we can figure out what to do with 3.3, we can apply some of that
knowledge to figuring out a "fix" for other checkpoints?

--Kynn

Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 22:05:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT