W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Action Item: 2.1 Proposal (Navigation)

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:52:54 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010312185058.009bb2b0@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 03:51 PM 3/12/2001 , Anne Pemberton wrote:
>At 03:47 PM 3/12/01 +0100, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
> >Action Item:  Rewrite 2.1, possibly splitting into two guidelines
> >2.1  Provide a variety of navigation mechanisms
> >      <glossary>Navigation mechanisms</glossary> help
> >      the user find information on your site.  Providing
> >      more than one navigation mechanism makes content
> >      easier to locate and use.
> >      ISSUE:  What does "a variety" mean?  By this guideline
> >      I mean "use a site map, use a search feature, use navigation
> >      bars" etc.
>It's important to consider the size of the site to be navigated. At what
>size does the author need to add a site map? a navigation bar? A search
>feature? 

Another good issue.  Probably a "techniques" issue but I don't 
mean with that suggestion that we put off the discussion of this!
Techniques or checkpoint/guideline, we definitely need to arrive
at a decision on this.

A good source of info on this is the O'Reilly book "Information
Architecture for the World Wide Web", which I've used in a textbook
in my online course on Web Management.

--K

Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 22:04:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT