- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:46:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: Marti <marti@agassa.com>
- cc: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
There is a very simple transition path. Use an XHTML aware editor, or run your page through Tidy before publishing. It provides smallish returns, ubt significant ones. Like it is possible to use XSLT on it, and it works in XML tools as well as HTML browsers. And it gets people thinking in the right direction... Chaals On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Marti wrote: There is the "rub". I can define good reason for the use of XML, but the "execution" is at this point pretty messy. XHTML has better support but what real world reason is there for people to take the extra steps to implement that? Marti -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 11:47:50 UTC