W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Layout tables [ was summary attribute required? ]

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 07:11:49 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010307070600.03251a60@mail.gorge.net>
To: joeclark@qube.seeto.com (Joe Clark) (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 09:41 AM 3/7/01 -0500, Joe Clark wrote:
>clearly tells us not to use access tags in layout tables

This is similar to the restriction on using <hn> element for formatting 
purposes rather than as "headers" in the sense used by ToC generators. By 
making it a convenient means for larger-font dividers the implementations 
of the element drove a (thankfully fairly small) 'nother nail in the 
accessibility coffin.

Some tools check HTML source for apparent abuse of such elements so there's 
some hope of automating the repair of this transgression.

Incidentally because 5.4 says "If a table is used for layout..." it puts 
the lie to the notion that the guidelines preclude the use of tables for 
layout!

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 10:12:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT