At 01:00 PM 3/6/01 +0200, Lisa Seeman wrote: >"minimize" and not "do not use" so that you can have alert boxes or other >necessary distractions. Repeat after me: "user-controllable". "Guideline 2. Design content that allows interaction according to the user's needs and preferences" - checkpoints may need crafting and techniques might be elaborate, but the *principle* is what we should keep in focus. If a user's environment would be ruined by crawling ants, but must still permit fire alarms, then we deal with that in techniques for achieving *needs* (P1) and *preferences* (P2/P3?). LS:: "The problem is concentrating or following and not interaction." WL: IMO "interaction" is still OK because diverting one's attention to ants/spiders/fireworks is clearly interactive. Thus "concentrating/following" are interactions in the sense used here. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGEReceived on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 08:23:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT