W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: What does "for example" mean [ was summary attribute required? history.

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:31:35 +0100
Message-Id: <a05010430b6c9a7e2097d@[212.155.241.130]>
To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Len's right -- I think he's encountered more of the rather free-and-
loose language of WCAG 1.0.  (Is it free to point out flaws in the
phrasing when we have examples in front of us?)

This is the type of ambiguity -- what do the "examples" mean? -- we
need to take care to avoid in WCAG 2.0.

--Kynn
-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 15:38:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT