Len's right -- I think he's encountered more of the rather free-and- loose language of WCAG 1.0. (Is it free to point out flaws in the phrasing when we have examples in front of us?) This is the type of ambiguity -- what do the "examples" mean? -- we need to take care to avoid in WCAG 2.0. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 15:38:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT