W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: Section 508 Question on Javascript - Section 1194.22, Paragraph (l)

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:27:07 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010213162056.05478780@mail.gorge.net>
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>, "Katie Haritos-Shea" <kshea@apollo.fedworld.gov>, "1 W3C-WAI Web Content Access. Guidelines List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 02:20 PM 2/13/01 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>there are poorly written requirements and that makes it hard for 
>people...to understand what exactly is required.

These words keep blithely tripping off your fingertips and I don't really 
understand why.

"Poorly written" is just too facile/inaccurate/demeaning for the document. 
It could be said (probably has) for just about anything ever written. I 
just can't accept that you don't "understand" the "requirements".

It can be better written and more understandable and that's why we're 
paying you the big bucks but meanwhile if you could curb the denigration 
just one notch it would be more comfortable herein.

C U @ CSUN?

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 19:29:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT