W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:41:13 -0500 (EST)
To: Robert Neff <robneff@home.com>
cc: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101211738300.19180-100000@tux.w3.org>
The first couple of sentences are good, but I would put them in the status
section. The abstract just describes the content of the document, as I
understand it.

I would be less certain about whether this will reduce the cost and time, and
particularly the cost. It might be smart to explain that is a goal, in
status. (And I like the idea of a Working Daft - a typo in that sentence


Charles McCN

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Robert Neff wrote:

  how about,

  <start rewrite>
  Since the intial release of the WCAG 1.0 in May 1999, a wide audience has
  had the opportunity to review and implement the checkpoints. Therefore a
  working draft of the next version has been intiated with the goal to
  incorporate comments and to address implementation, additional languages so
  a wider audience may more easily understand the checkpoints.  This Working
  Daft will also reduce the time and costs to review, understand and implement
  the checkpoints. As this Working Draft builds upon the WCAG 1.0, the
  objective has not changed and that is to 'explain how to make Web content
  accessible to people with disabilities and a wider audience through
  <end rewrite>

  i took some liberties and i have my falk vest on <smile>

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
  To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
  Cc: "Judy Brewer" <jbrewer@w3.org>
  Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:08 PM
  Subject: Proposa for Abstract for WCAG 2.0 working draft

  > Before publishing a new working draft I need to add an abstract.  What do
  > people think of this:
  > Abstract
  > This Working Drafts is the first step towards incorporating feedback
  > received on WCAG 1.0 since its publication in May 1999. Primarily, this is
  > the first attempt to write checkpoints that may be applied to a wider
  > of languages and that may be understood by a more varied audience.   Since
  > this Working Draft builds on WCAG 1.0 it has the same aim: explain how to
  > make Web content accessible to people with disabilities.
  > --
  > wendy a chisholm
  > world wide web consortium
  > web accessibility initiative
  > madison, wi usa
  > tel: +1 608 663 6346
  > /--

Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2001 17:41:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:36 UTC