Here's an additional "compliance scheme requirement" -- not tied only to WCAG 2.0 (or whatever), but allows expression of other groups' compliance claims if they so desire as well. In other words if we define RDF for WCAG 2.0 compliance claims, the schema should be expandable so that someone could use the same _method_ to claim 508 or other compliance. That way similar tools can be used to evaluate parallel claims. --Kynn >Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:49:44 -0500 (EST) >From: "Fitzgerald, Jimmie" <Jimmie.Fitzgerald@jbosc.ksc.nasa.gov> >To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> >Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:35:48 -0500 >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) >Subject: Indicating Compliance >Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> archive/latest/7395 >X-Loop: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >Sender: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org >Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org >List-Id: <w3c-wai-ig.w3.org> >List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> > >Hi all, > > If coding to the W3C levels of 'A', 'Double A', and 'Triple A', they >have kindly provided a method of indicating this compliance. Not so with >the 508 standards. Has anyone heard how we are supposed to indicate that a >page or site is 508 compliant? > >Jim Fitzgerald - Logicon Federal Data, A Subcontractor of SGS -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Sr. Engineering Project Leader, Reef-Edapta http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Contributor, Special Edition Using XHTML http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml Unofficial Section 508 Checklist http://kynn.com/+section508Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 16:46:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT