W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Structure of the guidelines: four options to consider

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:50:43 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010108184120.029c1390@mail.gorge.net>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 10:37 AM 1/9/01 +1100, Jason White wrote:
>concerns were raised that two quite distinct issues were being confusingly 
>brought together

Since IMO "confusingly" isn't in the hunt, I have no qualms about combining 
"comprehension" with "browsing/navigating" - OTOH if it really disturbs 
anyone it's pretty much OK to soothe their concerns.

I also think device-independence and interoperability/compatability are 
joinable. Again if that wedding makes people uncomfortable then I'll 
"forever keep my peace".

Finally I would vote for two and be delighted to accept three or four and 
vote against any more than that.

I also would hope that whatever motion carries will become the set of 
receptacles for all the checkpoints to be deposited in and that we can 
write "finis" to that phase of the discussion and get on with editing their 
language to perfection so that we can craft the admirable 
techniques/examples in time for the next harvest!

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Monday, 8 January 2001 21:49:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT