- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 07:54:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hmmm. I figure I am the resident purist. And I thought I already said that I think we will have to write about different flavours of HTML, including those that are not W3C Recommendations. (one reason is that it is perfectly legitimate for a tool to produce something according to a propritary doctype - e.g. a different modularisation of XHTML, or simply a different DTD and mark it as such. There are tools that do this already.) cheers Charles McCN On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kynn Bartlett wrote: Likewise, we might want to say, "Instead of using the non-standard TOPMARGIN attribute, use the appropriate CSS" or whatever. I think that despite what our resident purist may think, we will definitely have to refer to non-standard HTML. --Kynn -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 07:54:03 UTC