W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 22:49:44 -0800
Message-Id: <a05010408b6787b287498@[]>
To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 3:25 PM -0500 1/2/01, Leonard R. Kasday wrote:
>Len again:
>How about the following:

That's a possible implementation, and that's fine.  At the moment I'm
gathering -requirements- for conformance schemes; how would you
characterize (or reverse-engineer) the requirements expressed by
the proposal you gave?

Would you say that they are adequately summarized by the following:

* Preserve compatibility with the WCAG 1.0 conformance scheme.

* Expand the range of conformance claims beyond merely those
   within the WCAG 1.0 conformance scheme.

* Allow reporting bodies flexibility in determining which parts of
   WCAG 2.0 to report compliance with.

Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 02:16:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:35 UTC