W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2000

Sv: Agenda

From: Claus Thøgersen <thoeg@get2net.dk>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 00:30:36 -0700
Message-ID: <004301c0399e$b4340d20$4aa1a8c0@stofanet.dk>
To: "Jason White" <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Jason,

I think the discussion started by Charles on baseline capabilities should be taken up, because we seem to be close onto a workable sollution regarding as I understand it one part of defining what and when a technology can be said to be accessable. It is very close to beeing a UA topic but nobody has suggested moving it to UA.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 4:36 PM
Subject: Agenda

> On Thursday, 19 October, 20 hours Coordinated Universal Time (4 PM in
> Boston, 10 PM in France, 7 AM Friday in Eastern Australia), a working
> group teleconference is to be held: +1-617-252-1038
> Agenda
> 1. Checkpoints 2.3, 3.1 and 6.1, as amended in response to issues
> discussed last week. Note that a draft reflecting these changes will be
> published prior to the meeting.
> 2. The proposed checkpoint related to the accessibility of user interfaces
> that control user-specified content selection options.
> 3. Ian's proposal, at the face to face meeting, for a requirement that
> text equivalents (guideline 1) be associated explicitly, in markup or in a
> data model, with the auditory or visual presentations to which they
> provide alternatives. 
> 4. WCAG 1.0 errata to checkpoint 3.1, as discussed on the mailing list.
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 18:31:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:34 UTC