W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Questions regarding compliance and alternative pages

From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:47:06 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org

>Regarding an inaccessible page with link to accessible version, Ian wrote:

> > Yes. The conformance claim should indicate the scope of the claim,
> > in this case a combination of two pages.
> > (For background, refer to
> > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-pr-issues#conformance-alt-pages)

How should we indicate the scope?  Or are you saying, skipping ahead to 
your other comments, that specification of scope is something still being 
worked on?

 > Yes. And that's where we need to spend more time working on the
> > metadata (schema?) to use in conformance claims.

I get a mite bit worried about asking authors to learn about 
metadata/schema just to make a conformance claim.


Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and
Department of Electrical Engineering
Temple University
423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122


(215) 204-2247 (voice)
(800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2000 10:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:32 UTC