Hi, Dick That was the checkpoint I was referring to. However, my statement was not about text-only web sites, but web sites with parallel graphic and text-only web pages which the checkpoint strongly urges avoiding unless absolutely necessary. Scott > Scott, I don't understand why you say: > "... the use of text-only versions means that the NY Times is out of > compliance with the guidelines." > > I can't find any checkpoint in the content guidelines that prohibits > text-only sites. > > The pertinent checkpoint seems to be 11.4: > "If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a > link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has > equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the > inaccessible (original) page." > > Would you please elaborate? > > Thanks, > Dick BrownReceived on Thursday, 10 February 2000 23:19:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:50:39 GMT