I found that the Web Characterization activity also uses "WC" acronyms. I had thought they were using WC but it turns out they use WCG as well as WCA. I had proposed WCG for the Web Content Guidelines working group in the draft of the charter. This obviously won't work. Therefore here are some new proposals: 1. WCAG WG - it puts the "accessibility" back into the name, but people could potentially confuse the working group with the document. 2. WCGL WG - Web content guidelines working group. i have no issues with this one. Previously Discarded: 1. GL - people could infer that the WAI only produces one set of guidelines. 2. markup - too general and confusing with markup activities. so far, (2 responses) WCAG WG is the running favorite with the WAI team. thoughts? --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--Received on Friday, 7 January 2000 13:03:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:01 GMT