W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Final review of WCAG requirements document prior to publication as a W3C note

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:10:38 -0400
Message-ID: <3908D6FE.D4561EF9@w3.org>
To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
CC: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Jason White wrote:
> There appears to be general consensus within the working group regarding
> the content of the WCAG 2.0 requirements document:
> http://www.w3.orgWAI/gl/wcag20-req-20000419.html
> Please review the document and send any final comments or objections to
> the mailing list, prior to the working group meeting on Thursday 4 May. In
> the absence of substantive opposition, the requirements document will be
> published as a W3C note shortly thereafter. You therefore have
> approximately one week in which to review it and suggest changes.

Is there a reason this is being published as a Note rather than
as a Working Draft? The other requirements documents currently
in development are Working Drafts, including:


While there's nothing that prevents the Working Group
from requesting publication as a Note, I recommend that
you request publication as a Working Draft since this
is a work in progress. The requirements will certainly
evolve as the Working Group continues to work. 

There is no requirement that a Working Draft advance
to Recommendation. At a later date, the WG may choose,
to incorporate the requirements as an appendix to
the WCAG 2.0 Recommendation. Or the Working Group can
request publication of the final requirements as a 
Note. But for now, I recommend requesting Working
Draft status.

 - Ian

Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2000 20:11:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:32 UTC