W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: woodcutter

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:27:46 -0500
To: "'Jonathan Chetwynd'" <jay@peepo.com>, "'w3c'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001501bf9ce1$e8eec500$6234f018@compaqm700>

I don't understand.  Are you saying that sites like this
 http://www.peepo.com/drivethru5/) and woodcutter are what your talking
about as being what we should target?

For example:  Is this what you think the W3C WCAG website should look like
to be more accessible to people with cognitive disabilities?

I'm sure that's not what you mean - but I don't know what you do mean.
Could you help me.  I am confused as to what we are discussing.


-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/
FAX 608/262-8848
For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]  On
Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd
Sent:	Sunday, April 02, 2000 11:20 AM
To:	love26@gorge.net; w3c
Subject:	Re: woodcutter

perhaps if you prefer a less acidic experience
http://www.peepo.com/drivethru5/ fits the bill.
It's about a year old but still functions just.

The graphics leave rather a lot to the imagination.


special needs teacher
web accessibility consultant
Received on Sunday, 2 April 2000 16:28:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:32 UTC