W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: agenda for 23 December telecon

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 06:25:04 -0800
Message-ID: <386230C0.DA4F6FB4@gorge.net>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I think the "Mission Statement" should say something like: "The WCAG are
the cornerstone of the WAI effort and provide the basis on which all the
other Recommendations depend: AU, UA, and ER." although it's heavily
addressed in section 9, might deserve up-frontness?

2.2 "documented in the Techniques document" might enjoy a better verb.

4 Deliverables #s 3 and 4 are implicitly contained or necessary for #2
to have happened so might be better included in #2.

Still think 5 is UA job - let's avoid a "jurisdictional dispute"?

8 might also be considered an integral/indespensible part of 2?

7. Schedule has "Working Drafts are available to the public, but a call
for public review has not been issued." something grammatically grating?

9.1 "Once PF has identified or worked through an accessibility barrier
with a group, we need to update our deliverables as accordingly."
grammar?


-- 
Love.
            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Thursday, 23 December 1999 09:26:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:50:39 GMT