If there is "content" in the clip (EITHER video or audio), then by not having alternate media available (of which a transcript is the easiest and most obvious) you have shut out either the blind or the deaf. This is a P1 violation! How could it be otherwise? On Monday, December 20, 1999 10:39 PM, Robert Neff [SMTP:robneff@home.com] wrote: > from an implementation standpoint, what does everyone think about having > text transcripts as P2 for a video clip and synchronized captions P3?Received on Tuesday, 21 December 1999 13:28:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:01 GMT