Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > The benefit of having the desc defined within the symbol is that it reduces > teh amount of work required, and provides a simple mechanism to ensure that > people can use well--described graphic elements from libraries. Yes. > The benefit > of having it as a sibling for a use element is that it is easier to write a > player that does not need to dereference the URI of the use element. I have no idea what you mean by that. How can a symbol be used without fetching it? Besides, these descriptions would be different. One is the description of a symbol; the other is the description of one usage of a symbol. > But it > seems like that would only really apply to a generic XML renderer that used > a style sheet to render some textual content, and make no use of Xlink. The former is possible and desirable, the latter is not a good idea. -- ChrisReceived on Wednesday, 29 September 1999 12:34:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:50:37 GMT