W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:44:48 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990721134448.0120b2f0@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I have closed discussion of Checkpoint 3.3 on the WAI IG and the Education
and Outreach Working Group list, since this discusssion is really right in
your working group's territory. So the Web Content Guidelines Working Group
is now carrying this discussion until resolved. 

Please report back to WAI IG and to the EOWG once there's a resolution on
this -- thanks.

Judy

At 07:13 AM 7/21/99 -0400, Neff, Robert wrote:
>How does every one feel, if we were to make a separate checkpoint section
>for all CSS relaed items?  We could even put check point 11.1 as the lead
>checkpoint for this CSS.  That way, "Use W3C technologies when they are
>available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when
>supported" is up front and if someone chooses not to use CSS then this whole
>section becomes "Not applicable". 
>
>Thanks to Judy for pointing out Checkpoint 11.1 <smile>.
>
>my difficulty now is if i am rating a site's conformance or if some one is
>rating this for me, then we really have to dig and causes extra work.  We
>need to streamline the review process as I am sure other people besides me
>would appreciate this!
>
>I think we can look at this from a usability focus.  Basically CSS is all
>over and rightly so, but does it make sense to centralize this?
>
>rob
>
----------
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 13:56:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:00 GMT