Re: GL comment

By george, I think you've got it!  I much prefer your suggested wording
about checkpoint verification.

Chuck

At 06:52 PM 3/14/99 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>Counter proposal:
>
>   Each checkpoint is specific enough so that someone
>   reviewing a page or site may verify that the 
>   checkpoint has been satisfied.
>
> - Ian

----
Starling Access Services
 "Access A World Of Possibility"
  e-mail: info@starlingweb.com
   URL: http://www.starlingweb.com
    Phone: 613-820-2272  FAX: 613-820-6983

Received on Wednesday, 17 March 1999 18:39:49 UTC