W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Conformance Claims

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 10:17:19 +0100
Message-Id: <199903040917.KAA01071@www47.inria.fr>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
cc: ehansen@ets.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

> This numbering is backwards.  If you use numbers, level 1 of conformance
> must be the strictest.  The die is cast in the order used for priorities.
> Don't cross up the reader by reversing your field here.
> 
> Sorry I didn't catch this earlier.  Thanks to Eric for making the
> proposition clear.
> 
> Otherwise define an enumeration of adverbs, for example {essentially,
> substantially, entirely} conformant, for conformance to all { P1 , P1 & P2
> , P1 & P2 & P3 } checkpoints.

For what it's worth, at the time this conformance schema was
discussed, I suggested A, AA and AAA.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 1999 04:17:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:59 GMT