W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: NOFRAMES is the right way.

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 14:42:58 -0500 (EST)
To: dd@w3.org
cc: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902021440130.26535-100000@tux.w3.org>
That's exactly what I want.

As far as I can see NOFRAMES is the crucial feature of the whole frames
model that allows it to be accessible, in exactly the same way that ALT
and LONGDESC are crucial to IMG (although I far prefer OBJECT, and
will be happy in a few years when it is actually widely implemented)

On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

  
  But I'm OK with P2 for [NOFRAMES in] all FRAMESET if that's what people
want.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 1999 14:43:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:59 GMT