W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: TABINDEX - HTML Applications

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:40:08 +0100
Message-Id: <199901131440.PAA20812@www47.inria.fr>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
cc: "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, WAI Markup Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

> Note that this is the key question.  So long as the DOM just mirrors what is 
> in W3C languages and the dynamic behavior is defined in language outside the
> scope of the W3C specs, then the DOM can't do much to help us much with the
> accessibility of Web dynamics.  It can only close the barn door after the
> horse is gone.

Do you think W3C should endorse a particular scripting language as
being more official ? ECMAScript would be my choice, but I have no
idea if this is the most widely used, compared with JavaScript,
JScript, VBScript, etc, or if this is something the industry is really
rallying behind.
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 1999 09:40:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:59 GMT