Re: tired of this thread

>There have been two serious proposals, both from David Poehlman: 1) include
>guidelines that specify the inclusion of graphics as an aid to
>accessibility, and 2) change the current status of the guideline for
>"simple and understandable" text from "recommended" to "required". Either
>would be a masterful start in the right direction. 
>
>What is the next step towards including the needs of graphically-dependent
>into the next version of the WAI Guidelines draft?
>
The issues raised in the QED and related threads will be discussed by the
GL working group.  Please join us on that list and a teleconference call
next Thursday (3:00-4:00 p.m. EST - 617-252-1038) for further discussion.

thanks,
--wendy
wendy chisholm
human factors engineer
trace research and development center
university of wisconsin - madison, USA