- From: (unknown charset) Nir Dagan <nir@nirdagan.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 19:55:31 +0300 (Israel Daylight Time)
- To: (unknown charset) Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: (unknown charset) w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, john.gardner@orst.edu, jongund@staff.uiuc.edu, raman@Adobe.COM, charles@w3.org, jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU, asgilman@access.digex.net
My experience with Netscape4.51 is that is displays correctly a great deal of math symbols if 1. they are marked with decimal references 2. in addition the page is served with charset=utf-8 I have heard rumors to this effect for other 4.x versions. Internet explorer 5 does support (most) math symbols, both decimal and hexadecimal, and also name entities, but with name entities less symbols are supported. Lynx 2.8.1 supports *all* math symbols in *all* the different ways you can think of. This browser, however does not "support" the FONT face bug. My expreince in with Windows95. A possible modification of the guidelines is to use images with alt text according to HTML4.0, this way both Lynx and old, buggy, and non-standard graphical browsers will display correctly. The <FONT face> thing is not valid HTML because it attempts to add new characters with a mechanism intended to suggest apearance of characters. Nir Dagan http://www.nirdagan.com mailto:nir@nirdagan.com tel:+972-2-588-3143 "There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory." -- A. Einstein On Mon, 3 May 1999, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: > Hello, Some of you may get this twice - those of you who have previously > participated in the math and science discussions. If you are able, a response > by the end of the day would be appreciated. From my tests, most of the > character entities defined in HTML4 for math symbols were NOT supported by > Communicator 4 and Explorer 4. Thus, is the following technique valid? > > > > 2. Do not use to "generate" mathematical symbols. Use HTML character > entities > > (or numerical reference) instead. (FONT face should be used only for > > suggesting style) For example: a to generate the Greek lower case alpha. > this > > is incorrect as a conforming browser should render the Latin letter lower > > case a in this case. > > Follows is part of the source file that I tested - the character entity > information is taken from the HTML4 Rec.. In communicator I get question > marks, > in Explorer I get boxes. If you are able to produce something else, please let > me know what I have missed. I don't see that "symbol" is a valid attribute of > "face" but I tried it anyway, just for grins. Using FONT face for the whole > doc > produces interesting results Also note that the *only* character entities > that > are recognized are the last two (for division). It seems that everything > included in the list of "Character entity references for ISO 8859-1 > characters" > is supported by both. However, note that very few in this ISO list are related > to math. > > -- greek capital letter alpha, U+0391 > > -- greek capital letter beta, U+0392 > > -- greek capital letter gamma, U+0393 ISOgrk3 > > -- greek capital letter delta, U+0394 ISOgrk3 > > -- greek capital letter epsilon, U+0395 > > -- greek capital letter zeta, U+0396 > > -- greek capital letter eta, U+0397 > > -- greek capital letter theta, U+0398 ISOgrk3 > > -- greek capital letter iota, U+0399 > > -- greek capital letter kappa, U+039A > > -- greek capital letter lambda, U+039B ISOgrk3 > > -- greek capital letter mu, U+039C > > -- greek capital letter nu, U+039D > > -- greek capital letter xi, U+039E ISOgrk3 > > -- greek capital letter omicron, U+039F > > -- greek capital letter pi, U+03A0 ISOgrk3 > > ! -- greek capital letter rho, U+03A1 > > -- for all, U+2200 ISOtech > > -- partial differential, U+2202 ISOtech > > -- there exists, U+2203 ISOtech > > -- empty set = null set = diameter, U+2205 ISOamso > > -- nabla = backward difference, U+2207 ISOtech > > -- element of, U+2208 ISOtech > > -- not an element of, U+2209 ISOtech > > -- contains as member, U+220B ISOtech > > -- n-ary product = product sign, U+220F ISOamsb > > > ÷ is a more convenient form than w > ........ > > >
Received on Monday, 3 May 1999 12:55:50 UTC