I agree that the proper use of HTTP headers is a Good Thing (TM) and should be practised universally. I agree in principle that users should be able to take advantage of some kind of configuration mechanism, although in practise I am still sceptical - having had webservers changed on me a couple of times. I disagree that fixed-media websites are a fundamentally different case, and suggest that even if that is so they are sufficiently prevalent, particularly in education, to require the same level of attention. I also fail to see that there is something bad about HTTP headers and the spoofing of them in document META HTTP-EQUIV is not a good thing. I am happy to continue the discussion off list if nobody else is interested, but would genuinely like to know. Cheers Charles On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Alan J. Flavell wrote: However, I would suggest with respect that we have now explored the various issues, and I would not want to press the case over-much. Nevertheless, I do stand by my view that there is a good case for proper use of HTTP headers. best regardsReceived on Thursday, 17 December 1998 15:03:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:58 GMT