Re: results: HTML 4.0 tags

to follow up on what nir.dagan@econ.upf.es said:

> HTML4.0 should be the default HTML level of the guidelines. 
> Other versions are authoring-wise obsolete. 

> I can't see a reason to mention that IMG is available 
> in HTML2.0 and HTML3.2 when these HTML versions are 
> obsolete. 

Could you expand a little on what you mean by obsolete?  If 
an author writes in HTML2.0, does it work in most browsers,
or does it break?

Al