> For Images that are defined in <OBJECT>, how will a long description be > implemented? three options: - free style: in the object content, which is its short description, put a link to the long description in plain french or using a D. <OBJECT data=gif> photo of the earth from space <A HREF=long.htm>D</A> </OBJECT> - rel convention: in addition to free style, you mark the A to the long desc with rel=longdesc (or dlink) <OBJECT data=gif> photo of the earth from space <A REL=longdesc HREF=long.htm>D</A> </OBJECT> - using param: <OBJECT data=gif> photo of the earth from space <A HREF=long.htm>D</A> <PARAM name=longdesc value=long.htm> </OBJECT> adding semantic (like REL or PARAM) allows for better processing on the UA side. we need more experience from user or object param to decide. Wendy also raised a issue with nested OBJECT and which long desc applies to what, that I'd like to see presented in relation to that. > What implications does this have for the use of LONGDESC with the <IMG> tag? none, I think we should drop mention dlink for IMG altogether, just talk about LONGDESC, people that do longdesc before it's in tools will and can decide for themselves if they add D links or not.Received on Wednesday, 29 July 1998 15:58:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:55:03 GMT