W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: Identifying D-links with "rel"

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 16:42:26 +0200
Message-Id: <199806041442.QAA17067@www47.inria.fr>
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>, nir dagan <dagan@upf.es>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org

> > Bottom line: class is better than rel, because it's supported by css1.
> 
> Yes, but it is supported by CSS2: You can match on the value of
> any attribute. Does this have any bearing?

I think the fact that class selector is supported in CSS1 override the 
"thruth and beauty" aspect that using rel is better focused (plus the
point that Nir made about the HTML4 spec saying it's a rel for the
document, which is contentious as well).
Received on Thursday, 4 June 1998 10:42:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:57 GMT