W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: Identifying D-links with "rel"

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 08:20:13 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980603082013.008e4bb0@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: dd@w3.org, nir dagan <dagan@upf.es>, ij@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
What is the advantages of using "rel=dlink" over "class=dlink" for
providing a mechanism for UAs to identify a D-Link ?
Jon
 

At 11:10 AM 6/3/1998 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
>
>> longdesc is the modern D-link, look no further. 
>> Its only disadvantage is that it is not supported yet, 
>> but so is rel="description".
>
>The support for rel (or class) and longdesc go together, it's not
>about replacing one with the other.
>
>rel=description, or class=description, are meant to provide UA a way
>to formally identify a dlink as such, so that when both a longdesc and 
>a dlink A are provided by the author, the UA can get rid of one of
>them.
>
>
>
>
Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street
Champaign, IL 61820

Voice: 217-244-5870
Fax: 217-333-0248
E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
WWW:	http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
	http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 1998 09:23:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:57 GMT