W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > June 2004

RE: Draft ERT WG Charter for review and comment

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:00:38 +0300
To: 'Shadi Abou-Zahra' <shadi@w3.org>, 'William Loughborough' <love26@gorge.net>
Cc: 'Josh Krieger' <josh@zafu.com>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <01c301c44d2e$aff415a0$340aa8c0@lisaibm>

Will's comment: Perhaps we could build a validator...



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 8:07 PM
To: 'William Loughborough'
Cc: 'Josh Krieger'; w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Draft ERT WG Charter for review and comment



Hi William,

Thank you very much for sharing your comments! Could you please clarify
a little more what you mean, I'm not sure I understood that very well.

Thanks,
  Shadi


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of William Loughborough
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 19:02
To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Cc: Josh Krieger
Subject: Re: Draft ERT WG Charter for review and comment


As such things go, it seems OK but I would like to see the
"goal/mission" 
to be more towards getting a Web Service facility from the process
rather 
than a "recommendation", i.e. we should be moving towards a
validator/fixer 
like Tidy instead of guideline type document.

Less discussion, more coding so that it gets to be at least as usable as
Bobby.


--
Love.

Everyone/everything/everywhere/always connected 
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 04:00:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:42 GMT